• There would be greater transparency as exportable supplies compete at prices determined by the open market. A monopoly's ability to fix their prices inevitably disrupts the trade that would otherwise take place, a simple truth the CWB vehemently tries to deny.  

• All buyers would be able to compete for supplies based on market factors and not administrative decisions. The primary difference between the CWB monopoly and an open market is their tight control of the supply, which allows them to price and offer their product differently from market to market. That is why some importers have found themselves shut out of the Canadian market at the monopoly's whim.

• Some buyers, who have enjoyed price incentives from CWB compared to comparable wheat classes from other sources, may have to pay more for Canadian wheat. On the other hand, some who currently pay top dollar may see lower prices.

We must acknowledge that an open market could initially mean more Canadian wheat moving to parts of the United States as Canadian farmers seek higher returns. However, the huge price incentive that currently drives that desire would dissipate very quickly.

With an open U.S. and Canadian spring wheat market, cash prices on both sides of the border should equalize quickly after the monopoly distortion is removed.

A U.S. spring wheat producer can often sell his new crop in excess of $1 per bushel more than CWB is offering his Canadian cousin under monopoly control. That U.S. premium currently approaches almost $2 per bushel more than CWB's current new crop pool price estimate.

Once the CWB stops administratively under-pricing wheat at the farmer level, existing Canadian elevators will bid competitively for wheat. Canadian farm gate prices would likely rise to approach U.S. levels, depending on location, and much of the incentive to truck wheat to U.S. facilities would disappear.

We may still see more Canadian wheat come into and through the United States, but probably in trains rather than trucks, with much of it moving to export positions.

While both the United States and Canada are major export suppliers, neither can supply anywhere near the world’s current or future wheat import demand. Both countries would each win and lose some business during the marketing year.

Therefore, the more successful Canadian wheat producers become in actually achieving their goal of attaining the best possible return from the marketplace, the better chance U.S. producers have for success.

 “We believe that if the market is allowed to work, wheat producers in Canada and the United States and their overseas customers would benefit,” Tracy said. “U.S. wheat producers look forward to competing openly on the basis of quality, value and reliability.”