Changes in market oversight bill

Oct 30, 2009 8:16 AM, By David Bennett, Farm Press Editorial Staff

The substitute addresses jurisdictional issues in the context of swaps by providing for Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) jurisdiction over swaps and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) jurisdiction over swaps that are primarily based on securities. These two agencies are required to consult with each other and with banking regulators before regulating.

Prior to passage of a market oversight bill by the House Agriculture Committee last week, committee counsel Andy Baker outlined the changes between it and an earlier version, HR 977, passed in February.

Like 977, said Baker, “the substitute provides for position limits on physical commodities; clearing of over-the-counter (OTC) transactions; increased transparency, recording and record-keeping of offshore trading.

“The substitute also addresses jurisdictional issues in the context of swaps by providing for Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) jurisdiction over swaps and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) jurisdiction over swaps that are primarily based on securities. These two agencies are required to consult with each other and with banking regulators before regulating.

“The substitute requires a swap to be cleared if a clearing agency/organization will accept the swap for clearing and the CFTC/SEC has determined that clearing is mandatory. Clearing is not required if one of the counterparties isn’t a swap dealer or a major swap participant and can demonstrate appropriate business or risk-management practices for non-cleared swaps.

“Swaps that must be cleared must also be traded on exchange or on an alternative swap execution facility (ASEF) unless there is no exchange or ASEF that will list the swap. An ASEF is a facility for execution or trading of swaps such as an electronic trade execution facility.

“Voice brokers are still permitted to enter and execute swaps subject to the clearing requirements so long as they process the swap through a regulated exchange or ASEF.

“Uncleared swaps must be reported to a swap repository or through the regulatory.

“The substitute (amendment) requires swap dealers and major swap participants to maintain capital appropriate to the risk associated with non-cleared swaps being held as a dealer or major participant. Dealers and major participants must also meet initial and variation margin requirements to help their own safety and soundness and which are appropriate for the risk associated with the non-cleared swaps they hold as a dealer or major participant.

“Dealers must also meet set-aside requirements for funds or property associated with an uncleared swap.

“The substitute (amendment) requires the CFTC to establish position limits on swaps that perform a significant price discovery function and require aggregate limits across markets. It further requires CFTC to establish position limits on futures transactions for physically deliverable commodities that are applicable to spot-month/each month and all months aggregated — and to hold hearings on such position limits.

“The CFTC is also authorized to provide exemptions to position limits. The substitute (amendment) foreign boards of trade to meet certain standards of comparability to the requirements applicable to U.S. boards of trade and provides legal certainty for certain contracts traded on, or through, a foreign board of trade.”

email: dbennett@farmpress.com

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education

Accredited in Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina and Tennessee:


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

(New Course)
New Mode of Action Chemistry for Vegetable Production

Integration of a new mode of action compound like Coragen into IPM and IRM programs to control Lepidoptera in leafy greens, fruiting vegetables, peppers and brassica or cole crops is always welcome. This online CE accredited course details how best to use this new mode of action insecticide in intensive vegetable production. It is accredited by the Certified Crop Adviser (CCA) program and by state agencies for licensed applicators in Texas, Georgia, Florida, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Delta Farm Press Southeastt Farm Press Western Farm Press