Many factors influence peanut pod rots

Jun 3, 2004 12:00 PM, By Chip Lee Texas A&M Extension Specialist

Peanut pod rots are influenced by many factors. Such things as rotation, water quality, drainage, variety, and chemical control, as well as cultural practices and the type of pod rotting organism present all play a part in the pod rot question.

Rotation is the first and most important part of the picture. Rotation allows the background population of microorganisms to change continuously. All microorganisms have a preferred carbon source or organic matter on which they prefer to feed. Without rotation we quickly select out the strains that prefer to feed on peanut and they become dominant and more difficult to control.

Water quality also can play an important role. Water with excessive dissolved salts or pH tends to cause a weaker peanut plant more susceptible to fungal invasion. Some fields and water sources are simply not suitable for peanut growth.

Soil drainage, both surface and internal, also play a role in pod rot. A “wet spot” in a field caused by either temporary surface ponding or subsoil that “holds” water often allows the pythium pod rots to develop rapidly. In many cases this lack of drainage can be corrected. Deep plowing to break up a hard pan may correct internal drainage. Improvement of surface drainage to prevent temporary ponding may help. Planting these fields on a higher bed may also be helpful.

Peanut variety or cultivar may be another important factor. For example, Flavor-runner 458 appears to be excessively susceptible to all pod rots and thus should be avoided in problem fields. The Tamrun-96 variety lacks some of the desirable qualities of 458 but displays superior pod rot resistance. It is one of the most resistant varieties to Sclerotinia blight.

Chemical crutch

Chemical control is the crutch most often used to allow peanut production in spite of pod rotting difficulties. Growers should take care to rotate chemicals in some way. Some prefer to rotate chemicals from application to application while others prefer a year-to- year rotation.

We must not simply rotate chemicals, we must rotate classes of chemicals. For example, Folicur and Tilt are both in the “sterol inhibitor” class and for the purpose of rotation should be considered similar. In the “Stroby” group we have such chemicals as Flint, Headline and Abound. Although these chemicals are different they must be considered in the same class for rotation. If one chemical in a class develops fungal tolerance problems it is a good bet that others in the same class will develop the same problems.

Cultural practices, in particular crop residue management, play important roles in pod rot. Most pod rotting organisms do not actively feed on living tissue. Most produce some exudates, which kill tissue in advance. Consequently, they can start the cycle much faster if old crop residue is in close proximity to the peanut plant. Consequently, anything that moves soil and organic matter to the base of the peanut plant will enhance pod rots. The moving agent may be a plow or it may simply be wind.

Types of fungi

There are several types of pod rotting fungi. For the most part we group them as follows: rhizoctonia, Sclerotium, Sclerotinia or pythium. Most grow on the above-ground parts of the plant also. Pythium is the exception as it only grows below ground. Other lesser organisms such as fusarium, verticillium and botrytis sometimes cause problems too. Across Texas, rhizoctonia is the No. 1 problem in terms of total acreage. On a field-by- field basis, Sclerotinia is the most devastating. Thankfully, it is not so wide spread.

Regardless of what the organism is, it is going to require thoughtful management. We should always remember that pod rots are much easier to prevent than control.

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education

Accredited in Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina and Tennessee:


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

(New Course)
New Mode of Action Chemistry for Vegetable Production

Integration of a new mode of action compound like Coragen into IPM and IRM programs to control Lepidoptera in leafy greens, fruiting vegetables, peppers and brassica or cole crops is always welcome. This online CE accredited course details how best to use this new mode of action insecticide in intensive vegetable production. It is accredited by the Certified Crop Adviser (CCA) program and by state agencies for licensed applicators in Texas, Georgia, Florida, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Delta Farm Press Southeastt Farm Press Western Farm Press