The changing planet and the future of farming

What is in this article?:

  • The changing future of farming brings challenges.
  • Research team describes an urgent need for better predictive models of climate change.
  • Professor says science needs to better measure the many global changes that have taken place in recent years.

Political persuasion aside, it’s not much of a stretch for most farmers to agree with science that the planet’s climate is ever evolving. Periods of global cooling and global warming have been around for a long, long time, and while we have no idea how long each stage of climate might hang around before changing again, we are trying to get better at predicting it.

On June 7 Anthony Barnosky, professor of integrative biology at the University of California, Berkeley, and Co-author Elizabeth Hadly from Stanford University, published a review paper in the journal Nature, that details the work and the conclusions of a team of 22 scientists concerning changes to agriculture, fisheries, forest products, and clean water by the end of the century. The new Nature issue is devoted to the environment in advance of the June 20-22 United Nations Rio+20 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.

And the picture is not pretty.

In an article published in ScienceDaily June 6, the team, consisting of biologists, ecologists, complex-systems theoreticians, geologists and paleontologists from the United States, Canada, South America and Europe, describe an urgent need for better predictive models of climate change that are based on a detailed understanding of how the biosphere reacted in the distant past to rapidly changing conditions, including climate and human population growth.

Barnosky says science needs to better measure the many global changes that have taken place in recent years, and he suggests that by the end of the century there could be a reduction in biodiversity worldwide and severe impacts could take place that would affect much of what we depend on to sustain our quality of life. He says more detailed information is needed as soon as possible. Barnosky and team are recommending the development of a complete biological forecast that could help predict correctly the impact of the coming changes. This information, he says, could be used to help us plan for such a future and give us time to work on developing solutions to help the growing burden on natural resources.

Discuss this Article 2

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jun 15, 2012

It's all about risk management. We need biodiversity because a lot of new chemicals, ideas, food, and products come from, plus we need those insect predators. No use sticking your head in the sand or arguing over it. Risk management is good for farming.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jun 15, 2012

Sustainability is a key strategy to consider. Why go through through the manufacturing, distibution and retail chain for fuels and fertilizers when they can be easily produced on-site or nearby for less cost and improved results? Biodiesel and bionutrient fertilizers are very feasible today.

Post new comment
Sign In or register to use your Southwest Farm Press ID
(optional)

Continuing Education Courses
This CE course is accredited for hours in Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. The content focuses...
New Course
The 2,000 member Weed Science Society of America’s (WSSA) Herbicide Resistance Action...
New Course
The course details six of the primary diseases affecting citrus: Huanglongbing (Citrus...

Newsletter Signup