EPA delaying indirect land use ruling

Sep 24, 2009 2:41 PM

The Environmental Protection Agency is reconsidering its decision to incorporate indirect land use changes in calculating the impact of biofuel production on greenhouse gas emissions for the Renewable Fuel Standard 2.

The agency, which is charged with implementing the RFS 2 in the energy bill passed by Congress in 2007, has decided to “carefully quantify and consider the uncertainties surrounding lifecycle greenhouse gases for biofuels,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in a letter to Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin.

Harkin, former chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, and six other senators had introduced an amendment to the Senate Interior-Environment Appropriations bill that would prohibit the EPA, for one year, from spending funds to include international indirect land use change emissions in the implementation of the RFS 2.

Grant Gustafson, press aide for Harkin, said the senator had decided to withdraw the amendment because of the EPA administrator’s letter.

The letter stated that “Administrator Jackson recognizes the uncertainty in calculating the indirect effects on land-use change from greater biofuels production,” said Gustafson, who added she had committed to carefully quantify and consider uncertainties surrounding GHG.

“In light of the EPA letter, and because EPA had said it would delay issuing regulations to establish renewable fuel volume biofuel requirements for 2010, Sen. Harkin decided not to press the amendment,” Gustafson said.

“The senator considers setting those fuel requirements in a timely manner as critically important to our national strategy for reducing our dangerous dependence on imported oil.”

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

Subscribe to RSS headline updates from:
Powered by FeedBurner

Continuing Education

Accredited in Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina and Tennessee:


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

(New Course)
New Mode of Action Chemistry for Vegetable Production

Integration of a new mode of action compound like Coragen into IPM and IRM programs to control Lepidoptera in leafy greens, fruiting vegetables, peppers and brassica or cole crops is always welcome. This online CE accredited course details how best to use this new mode of action insecticide in intensive vegetable production. It is accredited by the Certified Crop Adviser (CCA) program and by state agencies for licensed applicators in Texas, Georgia, Florida, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Top 10 Articles of 2008

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Delta Farm Press Southeastt Farm Press Western Farm Press