Small cotton harvest translates into economic losses

Oct 15, 2008 10:00 AM

A new Texas Tech University Cotton Economics Research Institute study indicates that the economic impact of the cotton crop on the Texas High Plains economy will be sharply down this year.

Current estimates suggest a cotton harvest that is potentially 28 percent below average. With this reduction in the cotton harvest, economic losses between $302 and $517 million are expected in the region.

“Early-season high winds and late-season cool temperatures have worked together to limit the size of the High Plains cotton crop,” said Darren Hudson, the Larry Combest Endowed Chair in Agricultural Competitiveness and institute director.

Since 1997, the High Plains has averaged 4.4 million bales produced each year. This year, Plains Cotton Growers, which serves a 41-county region, estimates the size the 2008 crop will be around 3.2 million bales.

“If these production numbers materialize, the 28 percent drop in production will have significant impacts on the regional economy, especially in terms of a reduction of sales tax revenues,” Hudson said.

Texas Tech researchers used a regional economic impact model known as IMPLAN to examine the crop’s impacts, as well as provide estimates of the effects of the smaller-than-average crop. The model accounts for the direct impacts of lost gross income, and how these losses cause indirect and induced effects from decreased expenditures.

According to their results, the total economic impact of a 3.2 million-bale harvest is estimated to be $1.5 billion. A normal harvest of 4.4 million bales would have an economic impact of about $2.1 billion.

So what does these mean for you? The agricultural economists say the potential impacts of a smaller cotton harvest can be explained in either a “worst case” or “best case” scenario.

In the “worst case” scenario, there’s a reduction in High Plains’ economic activity of approximately $571 million for the region, with approximately $228 million of that falling on Lubbock County. The “best case” scenario calls for an aggregate loss of $302 million in economic activity, with $120.8 million for Lubbock County.

“Based on those same scenarios, a reduction of sales tax revenue of between $25 and $46 million is expected, with between $10 and $18 million of that loss falling on Lubbock County,” Hudson said. “To keep these impacts in perspective, the loss in economic activity is between 0.4 percent and 0.7 percent of the total regional economic activity.”

However, he pointed out that while lower than average, this year’s harvest was certainly not the smallest cotton crop in recent history.

CONTACT: Darren Hudson, Larry Combest Endowed Chair in Agricultural Competitiveness Professor, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, (806) 742-2821 or darren.hudson@ttu.edu.

Get Copyright ClearanceWant to use this article? Click here for options!
© 2009 Penton Media, Inc.


Latest Jobs

resources

events icon events

product info icon tradeshows

tradeshow icon digests

research icon photos

Continuing Education

Accredited in Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina and Tennessee:


(New Course)
Weed Resistance Management in Cotton

This course covers a wide range of options to effectively control weeds in cotton and reduce the risk of weed resistance management. It is accredited for hours/units for licensed/accredited applicators in 7 U.S. Cotton Belt states (Florida, Georgia, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, South Carolina an d Tennessee. CCA credit is pending).

(New Course)
New Mode of Action Chemistry for Vegetable Production

Integration of a new mode of action compound like Coragen into IPM and IRM programs to control Lepidoptera in leafy greens, fruiting vegetables, peppers and brassica or cole crops is always welcome. This online CE accredited course details how best to use this new mode of action insecticide in intensive vegetable production. It is accredited by the Certified Crop Adviser (CCA) program and by state agencies for licensed applicators in Texas, Georgia, Florida, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

This course is accredited in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming as well as for CCA credits:

(New Course)
Spray Drift Management

Keeping crop protection chemicals on the crop for which they are intended has been a cornerstone of farming not only to protect neighboring crops, but to not waste money allowing products to drift off the intended target. This accredited online continuing education course covers the critical elements of spray drift management.

Back to Top

Browse Print Issues

Additional Resources

subscribe to Farm Press Daily Delta Farm Press Southeastt Farm Press Western Farm Press